|
|
|
|
|
|
by tempsy
974 days ago
|
|
|
This is a really uncalled for response. The original comment pointed to the ostentatiousness of a luxury rental building, as if there is no place for it in SF. It lost value because of a global pandemic years after it launched that has caused rents to fall, but has still managed to keep vacancy rates below 10%. Obviously it could not have planned for something completely outside of its control. |
|
|