The issue has its context, and producing outrage out of thin air to shame a commenter into submission ain't helping you to make any point, really. It's a well-known fallacy which you are invoking
Huh? They are making a legitimate point by testing a person's claimed commitments against a hypothetical example. When did pretending not to understand hypotheticals become a thing?
All of those things are illegal in the country where Bandcamp operates. I think we customers already care to the extent that we ought to, and beyond that we should only insist that legal process be followed.
I don't care so much about Bandcamp that I'll make a personal judgement in their case, and personally investigate the details of their situation.