Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by crazygringo 978 days ago
The sources are their own tests described further down in the article. It mostly describes slowdowns of between 0–20%, but does say:

> But the critical aspect is that software BitLocker dropped random write performance by 45% compared to hardware BitLocker.

I don't think consumers are engaging in a lot of sustained random writes. On the other hand, it might be a reason to avoid software encryption on a database server with a lot of writes.

1 comments

> I don't think consumers are engaging in a lot of sustained random writes.

Let me introduce you to Windows update. It is both random and sustained permanently.

Windows Update must be such an energy hog, if you consider it across all users globally. I wonder how many MWh it consumes per year?
Ha, good point. Definitely wasn't thinking of OS updates.

Though if those are (hopefully) applied overnight, speed doesn't really matter.

Yikes, so sorry. I'm on a Mac, and while they certainly have their own share of problems, at least it's not that specific one.
TIL that second tuesday every month is random.