|
|
|
|
|
by runeks
972 days ago
|
|
> 2. Why Nota? > Existing document tools like LaTeX, Pandoc, Markdown, and Scribble can (for the most part) only generate static web pages. I feel like Nota is underselling itself here, or at least not properly arguing for why a new language was created. If LaTeX were a perfectly fine document language, then surely we could extend e.g. Pandoc to provide these dynamic features when rendering LaTeX to a web page. But instead, a new document language was created. Why? |
|
You could write scribble renderer that renders the document as a server that serves the document in parts over Ajax.