Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by esquivalience 967 days ago
I think markdown might be the solution here.
2 comments

We used to have word processors that exposed mark up. I wrote immense amounts of documentation in Wordstar on 8 bit machines and it was definitely more efficient than the WYSIWYG word processors that came later and faster even when the newer ones were running on much faster hardware.

Something like Wordstar would be better than MarkDown.

WordPerfect called it Reveal Codes.
Which was wonderful. Some (many, a few, who knows?) lawyers have stuck with WordPerfect for this reason.
WordPerfect 5.1 is un-surpassed. If my job was as textually-based as a lawyer's, I'd jump through any hoops necessary to keep it running.
Markdown isn’t detailed enough for legal stuff. Internal references, tables, complex section numbering require extensive post processing or simply don’t work. You quickly wind up with a lot of hidden magic that frustrates people used to word.

Last time I lost patience with doing Legal stuff in word and evaluated alternatives, I was most optimistic about Asciidoc. Unfortunately the ecosystem was relatively anemic… the strong syntax was limited by the tooling.

Looks like there’s been some improvement, maybe I’ll try again. There’s a nice new homepage at least: https://asciidoc.org/

The IntelliJ AsciiDoc plugin is a little juwel with all bells and whistles, Syntax highlight, Preview, structure view, even refactoring of references. We use it together with Antora.