|
|
|
|
|
|
by bogantech
979 days ago
|
|
|
After having read the document now I think I see the misunderstanding. From my understanding the attack is: 1. Hold a row open for 70us 2. Ram controller may refresh a row 3. Go to 1 I saw nothing that mentioned a hard requirement of 64ms referenced in the post you replied to - they only mentioned that they kept it within 64ms to
"Prevent data-retention failures from interfering with read-disturb failures" |
|
|