[coldtea]

How is turning an exchange about the merits of going to Mars or the quality of a VC-slash-startup-guru-blogger output into cheap psychologizing and ad hominems serving you?

Do you think you come out as balanced and happy by doing this?

Do you regularly think anybody that thinks differently than you, or doesn't gulp down whatever snake-oil the "succesful" sell, is problematic, unhappy, unsuccesful, unbalanced, and should "change their mind"?

Do you think that only business guru admirers or grind culture entrepreneurs are "happy"? Do you think only techno-optimists dreaming of strongmen like Musk and Bezos giving them Mars colonies are "balanced"? (And do you think either groups are anywhere close to a balanced person, as opposed merely naive and happy-go-lucky victims of Californian Ideology?)

How long have you been thinking like that?

[nickpp]

Belief systems can all be attractive in theory but you can compare their merits by simply looking at the actual results in the life of people adopting them.

Since you are aggressively pushing yours onto others it would be interesting to know how they work for you. Sorry if it felt as an ad hominem attack, it was never my intention, I was just curios. My apologies.

[coldtea]

>Belief systems can all be attractive in theory but you can compare their merits by simply looking at the actual results in the life of people adopting them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult

>Since you are aggressively pushing yours onto others it would be interesting to know how they work for you.

Well, it has worked fine thus far. So, there's that.

Not sure what kind of "belief system" you have deduced I have, based on that I'm against the hype of Mars missions, or I don't like VC-culture.

It hardly seems enough to deduce any general belief system, much less one that has wide consequences in personal life, as was implied. If anything, both sound more like common sense, or at least not being pro-hype or sucking up to the rich, than a belief system.