|
|
|
|
|
by jtreminio
971 days ago
|
|
> to me quiet quitting is fulfilling your job responsibilities and contract hours without going above and beyond for a workplace that just won't love you back. Someone needs to come up with a better name for this. “Quiet quitting” absolutely does not imply the above meaning… that’s simply work and nothing else. From the POV of a software developer I’d consider quiet quitting as doing the bare minimum work to not be fired outright and instead placed on a PIP with no intention of surviving it. You play your cards right and you would basically be paid 6 months for minimal effort, between when performance degradation is first noticed, PIP deployed, and your company Slack access is finally disabled. |
|
From what I understand, it's the corporate class that invented the term "quiet quitting" as way to shame people that don't go above and beyond.
Of course, nobody wants to go above and beyond anymore because it's not rewarded. Why work extra hours and offer to take on additional responsibilities when it won't lead to promotion or even a raise that keeps up with rent and inflation?