|
|
|
|
|
by archiewood
974 days ago
|
|
Really interesting read. Have you thought about how you might identify usability ‘gotchas’ in notation. For example two similar visualization components where the property names for a similar concept differ. Eg `title` vs `name` |
|
Our metrics would maybe capture some aspects of consistency/viscosity, because `title` and `name` would both count towards vocabulary size, and because the distance between specs would be higher if `title` routinely needs to be changed to `name` when iterating, but that's about it. I don't believe a metrics-based approach like ours can quantify much if any of 'closeness of mapping' because that mostly happens in people's heads, not in the source code itself :)