[AnimalMuppet]

There is a lot wrong with your statement. The US economy has parts that are centrally planned.

The PRC had enormous economic growth - and also a famine that killed millions of people. It was a centrally planned absolute catastrophe. Then in the 1970s, they realized that central planning wasn't going to keep working, so they moved to more of a free market approach - not totally, but much more than they had. And growth continued for several more decades.

> But the distribution portion of the economy for the US is compared to the centrally planned production if the other economy. It makes no sense.

Where are you getting this from? Certainly not from the parts you quote.