|
|
|
|
|
by pandaman
982 days ago
|
|
>An actor who refuses to join the union will have a harder time getting work This does not make membership an option, does it then? This is exactly the reason programmers like myself oppose the unions. Bringing up SAG in this context seems to be counter-productive to me but you can do that if you think this increases union's support somehow. So I was wrong on the Jordan's membership, then who was playing in NBA without being a member if you say it's possible? |
|
Yes it does. You are just redefining the meaning of "choice" now. There is always going to be pros and cons to any choice including this one. What do you want the non-union membership to look like? There are obviously going to be downsides to not joining the union or else there would be no reason to join the union and if there was no reason to join the union, it wouldn't exist.