|
|
|
|
|
by dangus
974 days ago
|
|
As a former Atlassian administrator, I believe the opposite. Maintaining the system on-premise was a bigger risk. The products are too complicated to be packaged nearly with a bow for sysadmins. You inevitably start having to become at Atlassian SME just to keep that shit running. I’m all for your company going with an alternative product, but for a company who would rather stick with Atlassian products, you’d be insane to prefer the on-premise version. Either insane or you’re a giant company with heavy compliance requirements and you don’t mind hiring a dedicated person/team to operate the data center product and babysit other on-premise vendors’ services. In my experience, I was running an on-premise Jira installation for a <100-person company, which was an insane waste of my time compared to the other tasks I could have been doing to help build our core product. |
|
I'm curious what were actually tasks that wasted your time?