[rwmj]

Is there not any danger of tenants rewriting the firmware on these drives, and surprising (or compromising) future tenants? AIUI this is the central reason why even "baremetal" cloud instances still have a minimal hypervisor between the tenant and the hardware.

[nixgeek]

I’m not sure what makes you think an “minimal hypervisor” exists — Oracle Cloud Infrastructure doesn’t have a hypervisor of any sort between you and its .metal instance types. Don’t think Amazon EC2 does either.

[rwmj]

Amazon have their own partitioning hypervisor for this purpose. It sits below any hypervisor that might be visible to the tenant.

[wmf]

The top clouds (AWS/Azure/Google) have custom firmware to solve this problem. Second-tier clouds probably don't so customers can reflash firmware.

[otterley]

If your second sentence is true -- and I hope it isn't! -- that would be a gaping security hole.

[wmf]

To be fair, some of the bare metal providers reflash firmware when the machine is reprovisioned. In theory firmware "implants" could survive reflashing but I don't know if such a thing has ever been seen in the wild.

[nerpderp82]

This needs to be taken into account when running on metal instances with different cloud providers. You would also want an assurance that metal instances aren't ever repurposed to be VM hosts in the future.

[idanp]

Virtualization can happen in the hardware itself, e.g. SR-IOV.