[doggerel]

No, children should not have access to "all information". The world is full of information and media that would traumatize them. For example, murder videos from a brand new war. Radicalization content would also go on my "not for children" list.

There is plenty of material that children lack the tools to understand and digest without trauma or ideological absorption. Most adults lack those skills too, to be fair.

There should actually be ways to choose for your children what kinds of content you would like them to have access to until they're mature enough to decide for themselves. If you want to limit it to educational content, that's up to you as a parent.

[bracketslash]

who gets to decide how "radical" is defined and what is classified as "radical"? I certainly agree with leaving it up to the parent.

[willvarfar]

Was the recent John Oliver segment on home schooling hyperbole? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzsZP9o7SlI

[lm28469]

Like the parent of the dude who just cut the throat of that French teacher ? It's a family of radical islamists but who are we to say they're radical ? Maybe we just don't understand them ? maybe we are the problem ?

Is antisemitism radical ? Are islamists radical ? Who knows right ? Such a tough question!

[master-lincoln]

For you the world seems to be black and white (assuming your comment was sarcasm).

Radical means favoring extreme changes. So depending on where you live and in what part of society the things you mentioned above might not be seen as radical or they might be.

I for example would have liked to not give children access to a bible too. That might be seen as radical in some christian societies...

[bracketslash]

Is wearing a burqa radical? Are books that have inappropriate language radical? Are transgender rights radical? It’s a slippery slope. Banning access to information is dangerous.