|
|
|
|
|
by nyssos
971 days ago
|
|
D-separation still works for cyclic graphs, it just can't rule out causal relationships between variables that lie on the same cycle. And neither can any other functional-form-agnostic method, because in general feedback loops really do couple everything to everything else. More rigorously: given a graph G for a structural equation model S, construct a DAG G' as follows - Find a minimal subgraph C_i transitively closed under cycle membership (so a cycle, all the cycles it intersects, all the cycles they intersect, and so on) - Replace each C_i with a complete graph C'_i on the same number of vertices, preserving outgoing edges. - Add edges from the parents of any vertices in C_i (if not in C_i themselves) to all vertices in C'_i - Repeat until acyclic d-separation in G' then entails independence in S given reasonable smoothness assumptions I don't remember the details of off the top of my head. |
|