[muglug]

> the best model is at least 10x smarter than the free version of ChatGPT

Citation needed. What does 10x smarter mean here? There’s an ongoing debate about whether the word “smart” even applies to a text prediction engine.

[datameta]

My gut metric says it's a ~20% increase in perceived interpretation and output complexity, whatever that means exactly. But there are plenty of eval result aggregators out there.

[mewpmewp2]

To me GPT-4 seems actually intelligent and reasoning capable while GPT-3.5 does not. Many of my usecases involve giving large bodies of text to GPT and asking to reason about this. 3.5 has no clue, but 4 seems to handle it intelligently.

Overall it is as if GPT3.5 feels just like a clueless summarizer, but GPT4 intelligent interpreter and reasoner that I can trust.

Depending on which way you look at it, it could be 10x or 1000x the intelligence.

[datameta]

I think trust is a key thing you've hightlighted. I find myself doubting GPT3.5, whereas not at all for GPT4.

[muglug]

Yeah, there are measurable results on things like AP bio. And those are definitely not 10x.