Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by CuriouslyC 981 days ago
The only person hurt under that scheme would be just that, people who go viral out of nowhere. Other users could re-upload the video to mirror it though, so there's an easy workaround.

Seems like a small price to pay for a YouTube with integrity that respects both creators and viewers and treats both fairly without trying to exploit anyone.

1 comments

“I don’t want to pay $15/mo.

But if a creator I like gets a big bill, I’ll take their video and re-upload it without their permission to mirror it and cut down their bandwidth bill.

Now I only pay $400/mo!”