|
|
|
|
|
|
by nathanrf
981 days ago
|
|
|
`const`-as-comment is specifically limited to pointers and references - `const` on objects definitely does change semantics (it is always UB to attempt to modify a `const` object). Another good example is string literals (except when initializing a non-const `char[]` variable), which are often allocated in read-only data in the same way, since they are const objects too. |
|
|