Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wongarsu 982 days ago
According to GPT3.5-ChatGPT, your first sentence rot13 encoded is

"V unq'ir cynlq zhpug jvgu vg ercerfrag ohg V jnf haqre gur vacebprffvba gung PungTGC jnf abg tengure ng zngpuvfgbef."

According to the internet that decodes to

"I had've playd mucht with it represent but I was under the inprocession that ChatGTP was not grather at matchistors."

base64 of the original according to GPT3.5:

"SSBoYXZlbid0IHBsYXllZCBtdWNoIHdpdGggaXQgcmVjZW50bHkgYnV0IEkgd2FzIHVuZGVlciB0aGF0IENoYXRHUFQgd2FzIG5vdCBncmVhdCBhdCBtYXRjaGVtYXRpY2FsIGNvbXB1dGlvbnM="

Decoded with online tool:

"I haven't played much with it recently but I was undeer that ChatGPT was not great at matchematical computions"

Both get worse as the sentence goes on, but they are pretty viable for information extraction. I remember GPT4 being even better.

1 comments

I feel that it getting the output _slightly_ wrong is far more fascinating than it either getting it perfect or completely wrong.
The whole thing is just a big pile of probability calculations feeding back into themselves.
So is everything ever produced by humans (or evolution)