|
|
|
|
|
by avocabros
979 days ago
|
|
A flaw in this article like every other I've ever read both acknowledges that we don't have good objective data and then also goes to say "remote work works, don't fight it", etc. COVID wasn't this big, controlled experiment that tested remote work - it was the opposite, there was no "control" as everyone went remote at the same. There isn't good data in either direction, and I doubt there will be, ever - but that's a poor reason to not be opinionated about something. There's limited and conflicting data on whether static vs. dynamic programming languages are more productive, but plenty of people on this site have very strong opinions on that. Remote work is no different. It is time to stop complaining one way or the other and let people and markets vote with their feet and dollars. |
|
I’m working 2 days per week from home for focus time. But nothing beats the bandwidth of face 2 face communication.
The hybrid option works well for me. But I’m glad we have days that most people are in the office.
It also depends. Im working at a startup. That’s a different environment that a multinational org.
Same discussion as with dynamic vs static: it depends.