[londons_explore]

> I expect one of the exposed features is to be able to unlock or start the car.

I'd really like that (effectively allowing third parties to implement their own tesla app).

However, I suspect that no/very few third parties will be allowed to have that API scope.

[jejeyyy77]

Why not? API calls are scoped to a token associated with your Tesla vehicle(s).

This API looks like it is meant to control entire fleets.

Also, like Apple devices, I assume Tesla will have master control over the cars in the same way and can brick them if needed.

[MBCook]

> Also, like Apple devices, I assume Tesla will have master control over the cars in the same way and can brick them if needed.

They’ve done this in the past a few times haven’t they? Like when people have done battery swaps or refurbs without Tesla’s approval?

[londons_explore]

I don't think they have bricked peoples cars directly...

They just take away the ability to do supercharging and to use the app.

Basically, your smart car becomes a dumb car. But you can still drive it - you just can't use any service that requires their servers.

[zoover2020]

What you just described is bricking then, no?

[verve_rat]

No. To brick something means to take away all functionality, to make it as functional as a brick.