|
|
|
|
|
by ccooffee
973 days ago
|
|
It's a VERY time-consuming process to do a thorough review of localization materials. I've spent multiple working days on single massive commits when working with an unreliable translation provider. I can absolutely believe that someone glanced at the diff (linked elsewhere in this HN thread) at thought "that looks good enough". It wasn't a very large diff, and didn't do anything that reviewers will be keyed for (bizarre punctuation, formatting errors, incorrect captured variable references, etc). Offensive localization strings is not a threat I'd considered when I did my work. I doubt the reviewers of this repo thought it was a concern. |
|