Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by charlesischuck 975 days ago
You pay for the system not the gpu with AWS.

It's absolutely worth the money when you look at the whole picture. Also lambda labs never has availability. I actually can schedule a distributed cluster on AWS.

2 comments

> It's absolutely worth the money when you look at the whole picture.

That highly depends on many things. If you run a business with a relatively steady load that doesn't need to scale quickly multiple times per day, AWS is definitely not for you. Take Let's Encrypt[1] as an example. Just because cloud is the hype doesn't mean it's always worth it.

Edit: Or a personal experience: I had a customer that insisted on building their website on AWS. They weren't expecting high traffic loads and didn't need high availability, so I suggested to just use a VPS for $50 a month. They wanted to go the AWS route. Now their website is super scalable with all the cool buzzwords and it costs them $400 a month to run. Great! And in addition, the whole setup is way more complex to maintain since it's built on AWS instead of just a simple website with a database and some cache.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37536103

We built a tool for lambda labs and other clouds that launches a specific instance whenever it becomes available and notifies you. We poll Lambda Labs for availability every 3 seconds. Would this be something that would be useful for you?