|
|
|
|
|
by kortilla
978 days ago
|
|
> They can do insider trading This is incorrect. https://www.natlawreview.com/article/sec-secures-largest-eve... > they can break the SEC rules to artificially reduce the share price No, stock manipulation with falsification of bad information is also heavily prosecuted. Can you give specific examples where you think this happened? You might not be using the correct definition of “inside information” or “artificially reduce”. |
|
Pfizer top-people bought a huge amount of shares before their vaccine was publicly approved and they sold it the moment the public was made aware that there was a vaccine for COVID-19 approved by the FDA
Microsoft bought a lot of Activision Blizzard shares a few days before they announced they would buy the company.
Having this thin line separating what's allowed and what isn't is not ideal. If you have privileged information, for example, that your product will be approved, something that isn't public knowledge, it should be considered insider trading.