[inigoalonso]

Why can't the journals share reviewers? Once the reviews are in, the editors decide if they want the paper in their journal, and if more than one does, the authors get to pick. Obviously it would be a bit more complicated with revisions, etc. but it would be an improvement over the current system.

[evouga]

Who picks the reviewers and nags them to complete their reviews? This is the principal actual useful work journals do these days.