Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
KerrAvon
975 days ago
I was under the impression that COBOL's English syntax was intended to be a more human-readable approach, not so much a workaround for character set limitations.
1 comments
pavlov
975 days ago
Maybe both? COBOL predates the first draft of ASCII by several years. Character sets were far from standardized in those days.
link
noizejoy
975 days ago
Lots (most?) of classic COBOL used EBCDIC[0]
[0]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBCDIC
link