[neontomo]

Yeah, even with stock image platforms, having different licenses on every photo becomes a research project if you are working with any great amount of photos. I much prefer it when the websites have a standard license that is applicable to everything on there, because I only have to read it once. Also, if I can't use a resource I paid for in commercial use, it's pretty, but pretty useless.

[gnopgnip]

With stock images there is really only one question, commercial use or editorial use. This distinction is more often about the subject than any decision made by the photographer or platform. Like a photo of any famous person is going to be editorial, unless you get the subject's permission.

The license will be royalty free on even the cheapest microstock services