Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by MPSimmons 989 days ago
oh wow, that's interesting. I am assuming it was European. Do you think what you learned made it worth the effort?
1 comments

The effort was zero - I copy-pasted an e-mail template from the internet and volia.

Yes, this is in Europe.

I think I learned quite a lot, namely:

- why I failed the interview (I struggled to produce correct code, the code wasn't very robust and I said it's ok to put it into production)

- why I haven't failed the interview (ex. no mention of my English language skills) - which was more valuable for me than the "why I failed"

- a fairly good confidence that there's little details omitted - when they submit you a voluntary feedback they may give just the most obvious information. Ofc I didn't get the data about what was said on internal meetings.

- some insight into their internal structure, opinions of individual interviews about me etc.

I probably burned bridges with that company but after the interview neither party was interested in cooperation so I decided to give it a shot and see what happens.

I had to wait exactly 30 (or 14?) days (GDPR deadline) for the feedback to get to my mailbox.

I've been on the other side of this, pre-GDPR.

An interviewee was unhappy with my decision and felt that they hadn't had a fair hearing - and complained.

In this case we had a standard form where we assessed candidates over multiple factors (comms skills, technical skills, etc) - so if they got to see the result they'll have seen evaluations on all of that.

I wasn't very impressed with getting the complaint (the only one out of 100+ interviews) but hopefully GDPR is a more neutral way of getting that sort of feedback these days.

> hopefully GDPR is a more neutral way of getting that sort of feedback.

Only a complete fool would comply with this request. GDPR is not a magic codeword that can force companies to give data away. I am not calling BS on OP's request, but there is absolute no way that internal communications about an applicant falls into GDPR. Basic test: did the person had to consent to "people will talk about you over email" somewhere? If not, it is not data protected by GDPR.