It must sting to be worse at reasoning than the thing you're claiming isn't capable of reasoning at all. I know it's hard to accept that something as simple as dumping a lot of data into a probabilistic engine will eventually be able to outperform a human at any task, but it is our unfortunate reality and the sooner one faces that the easier it'll be.
I read what you wrote, and I responded to your arguments, not about you as a person, so as I pointed out elsewhere this is also not a valid argument - these were not ad hominems.