[freejazz]

>Also what's the point of the question. GPT has been specifically trained to not answer this. But in any case here is the answer with instruct model which generally is more open ended:

It would demonstrate basic reasoning skills that weren't things one would "reproduce, mix and match text from an enormous corpus". Like the response you provided, which is meaningless word salad. It's a prima facie takedown of your post.

This is like people who hate poetry, insisting their bad poetry is good poetry. Why? Because who else is to say otherwise! Well, the good poets. The people that appreciate poetry will know the difference. Everyone else wont care, save for those invested in having to sell their bad poetry as good.

[YetAnotherNick]

What has poetry to do with reasoning? You should think GPT as a terse person who refuses this kind of thing. Certainly there are people like that who have good reasoning skill but can't answer your question in a poetic way(I being one).

[freejazz]

It's an analogy - something someone who hates poetry would hate