[di4na]

Yes. That plus the way apple implemented it.

In my case i was already on passkeys and google decided to just... forget them all on my other computers. I can't use them to get in anymore. Why? Who the heck knows.

This whole passkey shit is going to be a nightmare for UX.

[ghaff]

In general, the levels of security that people will increasingly need going forward, and the increasing requirement by companies to use that level of security, will be a usability pain for many people and a nightmare for at least a subset.

[rurp]

Is there any evidence that Google needs to mess with authentication flows? My mental model of the median Google account holder is that they have a bunch of photos/emails/docs/etc that are extremely valuable to them and their family, but of little value to criminals. With a dynamic like that, the security only has to be so high to deter random hackers and making it too difficult or confusing will ruin a lot of valid accounts and do much more harm than the criminals would have.

There are reasons to be skeptical of Google's motives here given their history of wanting to create user lock-in in various ways, and caring more about shiny new tech than general user experience.

[davkan]

There is incentive to gain access to personal emails. Not enough for spear phishing but enough for generic phishing. Access to email allows you to pivot to every online service in a person’s life.

[lazide]

“Weaponized” 2fa (already very common) is a huge UX fail too. In theory this could reduce those terrible flows.