Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tsegers 990 days ago
I'd argue @ is more suitable for a dereference operation than an "address of" one. It functions that way in an email address too.
4 comments

Also, then "int @p" would read "integer at p" which is exactly what "int *p" means.
That's precisely what Clojure did, where @foo is syntactic sugar for (deref foo)
So address-of could be an "@" symbol, but upside down.
Or a spanish question mark ¿.
Ah yes - that's true.