|
|
|
|
|
by ddematheu
977 days ago
|
|
The queues and storage are the foundation on which some of these other integrations can be built on top. Agree fully on the need for LLMs within the pipelines to help with data analysis. Our current perspective has been on leveraging LLMs as part of async processes to help analyze data. This only really works when your data follows a template where I might be able to apply the analysis to a vast number of documents. Alternatively it becomes too expensive to do at a per document basis. What types of analysis are you doing with LLMs? Have you started to integrate some of these into your existing solution? |
|
Initial tests though are showing that summaries are affecting the quality of answers, so we'll probably remove it from the default flow and use it only for specific data types (e.g. chat logs).
There's a bunch of synthetic data scenarios we want to leverage LLMs for. Without going too much into details, sometimes "reading between the lines", and for some memory consolidation patterns (e.g. a "dream phase"), etc.