|
|
|
|
|
by perrygeo
987 days ago
|
|
You're under-emphasizing the "and so many others" part. The causes of ocean circulation change are well known. This paper didn't even address the causality part and only focused on confirming the change. But the causality has been studied elsewhere: we know temperature and salinity are two of the drivers, and those are directly influenced by anthropogenic climate change. So it's more accurate to say that the synthesis of all recent research indicates fossil fuel emissions are a causal factor. The statement could have been worded more clearly, but it's supported by the scientific evidence. |
|
But you know, you have to wonder just how many big business astroturfers there are here. We know the oil companies knew about climate change in the 70s, and buried it. It's not at all unbelievable that they would pay influencers and the like to peddle downplays of climate devastation, in order to slow responses.
Obviously, we don't know for sure, since accts here are semi-anonymous. But it would make a great deal of sense to sow confusion and condemnation and downplay the anthropocene.