|
|
|
|
|
by daveliepmann
979 days ago
|
|
"All of the Clojure collections...are efficient and inherently thread-safe." https://clojure.org/reference/data_structures#Collections "Seqs differ from iterators in that they are persistent and immutable, not stateful cursors into a collection. As such, they are useful for much more than foreach - functions can consume and produce seqs, they are thread safe, they can share structure etc." https://clojure.org/reference/sequences I think it's a fundamental enough property of clojure data structures that it would be redundant to mention it in every docstring. |
|
(why I was in doubt, is because while immutable functional collections that clojure embaces are naturally thread-safe, there is an imperative aspect in creation of a lazy sequence from user provided function, and I was not sure clojure has to provide synchronization guarantees here)