|
|
|
|
|
by lambdatronics
978 days ago
|
|
Yeah, tungsten is far too expensive. Sounds like more realistically you would have molten silicon in graphite plumbing [0]. This article claims the self-discharge rate could be made 1%/day. There's been talk of doing solar concentration -> hot object -> thermophotovoltaic converter. IIRC concentrated solar already exceeds 40% efficiency so it doesn't make sense to add the extra step, unless you are using the solar concentration to "recharge" a heat storage system. I buy the argument that thermophotovoltaics can become cheaper on a $/kW basis than comparably-efficient fluid/mechanical heat engines. The power per unit area is intrinsically orders of magnitude higher than for direct solar, so even if these cells are pricier than regular solar cells, they have a fighting chance. Also, both the power density and efficiency increase with temperature, and in principle the operating temperature can be higher than that of a turbine (since the materials don't have to simultaneously withstand crazy mechanical stresses and reactive chemical environment). [0] https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2019/EE/C8EE0... |
|