[nuancebydefault]

When reading expressions like "market distortion" in the context of a topic like child care, I am a bit astonished. Children are our future, they will work when we retire. Investment pays off. In relation, I find the balance of how the subsidy is spread across the labour market is of a secondary order.

Please don't take this personally. I fairly wonder if the way of looking at these topics is a cultural or political thing.