Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by improv 984 days ago
Reminds me of when teachers told students not to use Wikipedia for research purposes.
2 comments

My wikipedia account is over two decades old, and I often bring this up when talking bee -keeping stuff... them both being "bottom up organization that results in a beautiful exchange of information."

This experience "went full circle" for me, January 2023... when ChatGPT cited SOMETHING I HAD WRITTEN into wikipedia (re: transistor density).

I clearly remember getting in trouble in class each year for using Wikipedia.

My podunk teachers couldn't fathom the difference between directly citing Wikipedia (just cite the source it references instead) and merely reading it.

Pain.

> just cite the source it references instead

You also shouldn't cite sources you haven't read yourself.

I agree?
Some teachers notice if you only cite sources on the Wikipedia page, too. More likely if the whole class is writing on the same topic.

The work-around is to write it from Wikipedia, but find sources by searching on Google Books. Being able to read a couple pages around each part you’re citing is enough, so their page allowance for restricted works is usually plenty.

Hit your citation count and real-book-source requirement (if they still do that second one) without leaving your chair. Barely more work than writing from Wikipedia and not covering your tracks.