|
|
|
|
|
|
by moe_sc
993 days ago
|
|
|
Your arguments don't really fit, what was previously said. There was nothing said against driving AI in general, just that 4700h of videos seems low. I also get that humans are pretty bad drivers, but isn't that exactly why we shouldn't use them as the baseline for AIs to compare to? We are now at a point where we can set high standards for AI, so we get a best possible result, because while it isn't feasible to have everyone learn driving over a couple of years, a good AI has to be trained once and can be used by many, so we have the time. And sure, it can be updated, but should we really trust companies to keep innovating once they are already allowed to have the AI in use? The incentive to do so is far bigger if they have to do so before they got any money out of it. |
|
|