|
|
|
|
|
by panick21_
989 days ago
|
|
They were forced to redouble on MIPS because Itanium was so late anyway. And even after Itanium came out making products around it took a while. And I'm not saying not reacting to Itanium means go all in on your existing ISA and your existing business model. That wasn't my argument. My argument was don't go all out on everything that currently makes you money and your costumers expect for a totally unproven architecture that even if it works out means that you are just gone be a commodity provider with commodity software. Something totally outside of the whole history of Silicon graphics. |
|