Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Scaevolus 995 days ago
Correct. Cloudflare's POP routing is quite extensive, and I'd be shocked if archive.is had more than a handful of backends it's routing to.

Even so, why would an extra few dozen ms matter at all? Archive.is appears to be spindle-limited, is a client with marginally higher RTT an issue? The admin is silly.

https://www.cloudflare.com/network/
2 comments
jrochkind1 995 days ago
It seems so silly and mysterious that it makes me wonder if archive.today wants exact client IP addresses for some other unstated reason. (It's not clear how/if archive.today, a possibly illegal site, brings in revenue?).

The whole thing is very odd.

link
depr 995 days ago
There is another reason but it is stated here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36971650 (routing people to the nearest server _outside_ their own country).
link
arkadiyt 995 days ago
> it makes me wonder if archive.today wants exact client IP addresses for some other unstated reason

They still get the client ip from the request to the service itself (unless you're using a VPN, but if you're using a VPN then archive wouldn't get your ip from your DNS request either).

link
mike_d 994 days ago
Do you happen to have a mapping of Cloudflare IP space to physical POPs?

To the best of my knowledge they do not publish this, which makes it quite a chore to track all their edge locations manually.

link
Scaevolus 990 days ago
You could probably take their network map SVG and convert the circle coordinates from integer Mercator projection points to lat/lon pairs, and then map them to cities.
link