[krenzo]

Ended on a hand of: K J A A Q and did not receive the Jacks or Better $1 payout. According to a brief search about the rules of video poker, a pair of aces is considered better than a pair of jacks.

[simpaticoder]

I also had a pair of aces and did not "win". Definitely a bug (probably aces are low in his code).

[seiferteric]

same here

[abluecloud]

yep, definitely a bug - seems like with when getting a winning of aces after the second deal. interestingly if you get a pair of jacks you get your winnings correctly. guessing aces are low.

https://imgur.com/a/H1Nzno3

[hunter2_]

> after the second deal

It's different on or before the second deal?

[jonny_eh]

I came here to complain about the same bug. I want my money back!

[appstorelottery]

Aces are low in this game - it's deliberate. But given the constant feedback maybe I should just make them high ;-)

[jader201]

I think you're getting constant feedback on it because that's the way almost all versions of Poker are played.

Aces _can_ be low in the case of an A-1-2-3-4 straight, but they can almost always be high as well, and almost always beat K.

Having aces always be low/never be high is super uncommon (it may not even exist in Poker, but I can't say for certain).

[wlonkly]

If it's deliberate, how do you expect anyone to get a royal flush?

[appstorelottery]

Aces low ;-)

[jcampbell1]

That is a bug :)

[richrichardsson]

More a "feature", even if an erroneous feature according to the consensus rules for poker.