[wildrhythms]

Here is your source:

>Of the billions in tax incentives granted to US companies every year by cities and states, many agreements require workers to come into the office some of the time, or at least live in the region. For companies receiving these incentives, relaxing in-office attendance could be costly.

>The contracts were crafted in a pre-pandemic era, at a time when commutes to the office were a given. Now governments are deciding whether to crack down or rewrite the rules entirely. In some states and cities, policy changes have already been proposed to account for the new reality of hybrid work.

tl;dr It's yet another way for these hugely profitable corporations to not pay their taxes.

https://archive.ph/eOeIv

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-02-21/another-t...

[cauch]

As I've said "I'm sure bad management and bad direction exist", you showing me one example of bad management or one motivation for having a bad management does not prove anything.

It's a fallacy similar to this one:

1) vaccines help avoiding sickness (equivalent to: working in the office can be a way to solve real problems that the dev doesn't care about)

2) big pharma can make a lot of profit by selling vaccine (equivalent to: working in the office can make profit for the company)

According to your logic, number 2 would "prove" that number 1 is impossible.