|
|
|
|
|
by netbioserror
997 days ago
|
|
The author keeps asserting the "inherent weakness" of steel-on-steel railways; however, there are very good reasons it has been settled on as a good choice. Friction and sound losses are generally minimized, thanks to a very small contact surface and smooth, hard materials with little give; wheels can be re-machined back into spec a couple times rather than being replaced; rails can be re-used for lower-speed applications when worn; unlike pneumatic tires, steel can be machine into conical, self-centering, turn-adapting geometries with fixed axles and no need for differentials; the list continues and is quite long. Apparently, a recent change to wheel geometry reduced wear and extended lifetime by as much as 40%. See Practical Engineering's latest video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nteyw40i9So |
|
Feels a little silly for relatively light humans being transported through high population areas.