| > These are not Admins who have qualified for a job I've become painfully aware of that. > That being said, new tools come out all the time to improve the situation Actually, the new "tool" — the content cache retention period — was the problem here, not the solution. https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/19232 > I do think your piece reads as entitled and ignorant, and you should give it a rewrite with a better understanding that you are addressing a community, not a company. I think your comments read as obtuse and ignorant. They smack of false dichotomies, as if any criticism of Mastodon is support of Twitter, kind of like the attitude that any criticism of Apple is support of Google, or any criticism of Democrats is support of Republicans. Your very first comment above: "The experimental platform with no VC funding whatsoever messed up, I'm going back to the fascist wasteland that is trying to juice me for money by showing me enraging content." Whereas my article had nothing whatsoever to do with Twitter, which wasn't even mentioned, and which I already left permanently. Also, Mastodon is not "experimental". It's more than 7 years old now. > edit: OP has decided he doesn't want me to comment further apparently, I am no longer able to reply, but I can still edit. Hacker News doesn't have a feature to block replies. (I wish it did.) |
My bad, OP, you are not censorious.
edit: and you, speaking directly, did not advocate for Twitter. I was way off on that one point.