That would be disappointing. The way I've always figured this would work is to just record the wearer using voice recognition and filter out everyone else unless some consent phrase is heard.
That would be the ideal way, but from the use cases on the site it doesn't seem to be the intended use.
My prediction is typical move fast break things tech bro culture. Release a product to everyone that is illegal in most states, wait for people to get hurt by it and care enough to complain, withdraw the product from the problem areas.
The fact they're so vague on who is recorded means they don't actually care, or at best don't have a solution yet to the problem.
My prediction is typical move fast break things tech bro culture. Release a product to everyone that is illegal in most states, wait for people to get hurt by it and care enough to complain, withdraw the product from the problem areas.
The fact they're so vague on who is recorded means they don't actually care, or at best don't have a solution yet to the problem.