[dylan604]

I want one that has a print of the "On Air" signs seen in studios.

I honestly think that something like that needs to happen to things like the Meta RayBan glasses that do live streaming. Instead of the eyeballs that Apple's device is using, it should have a "Recording In Progress" or "On Air" across the lenses. Just because I'm in public and prone to be captured in someone's image capture doesn't mean that I have to be part of their money making venture.

[spicybright]

IR blasting clothing is still legal to wear!

[dylan604]

i've been looking at the idea of ball cap with surface mount LEDs under the bill of the cap, but i'm not much of a cap wearer any more. i then thought if they can fit cameras into sunglasses, why not do the Orbital thing with bright LEDs attached to my sunnies? then, the evil grin comes out and starts thinking more sinister with lasers to not just ruin the shot, but the sensor itself. then i realize, i've got work to do, and forget the whole thing

[jjoonathan]

Like the anti-paparazzi clothes that regularly pop up in crystal clear photos?

[bookofjoe]

https://www.amazon.com/Internet-Censorship-One-Piece-Novelty...

[Kerb_]

If you mean the retroreflective stuff, that's because it requires a bright flash to work. Modern digital cameras now are generally good enough to not require flash for a good picture, even in low-light conditions, so paparazzi don't use them near as often.

Clothing or accessories that shine IR are a completely different functionality and while they could be stopped by paparazzi buying better IR filters, that requires an additional cost on top of the camera