Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Crash0v3rid3 986 days ago
Megan made so many assumptions in that article based on a slide and single quote that we can't even see.

How about they actually provide some evidence before making such claims?

3 comments

We don’t know how many assumptions Megan made or even who was testifying and what they assumed or what evidence was presented in court. Yes, that’s problematic.
It happens it is actually an evidence or key exhibit, in an anti-trust trial.

She could be surely sued by Google by reporting false events.

So I guess we can trust her reporting.

What?

Why should I trust her reporting? She gave us zero evidence.

Then I guess Google could sue her. And they would win.
Concrete question: how does the query rewriting service talk to the ads DB to do what's alleged?