[lozenge]

I agree as I used a tool Reviewable which is accurate about which version of the change is being commented on, which files you reviewed etc. It even supported rebases. And no comment was finally marked resolved until the original author marked it as such.

It was great for skilled users to navigate with the keyboard and easy to see when everything was resolved. But if used as intended, like fixing some commented chunks while debating others, the information displayed became unwieldy. GitHub PR reviews are simpler and that isn't a bad thing.

Edit: looks like it's still available and hasn't changed massively, I'm not surprised as probably a lot of licensees cancelled when GitHub added reviews (my company did). Check it out if the article speaks to you.

[fahhem]

We're still around and we've actually changed a lot. Our homepage is untouched (for now!) but you can check out our blog for proof of life :D

http://blog.reviewable.io/

[lozenge]

Sorry, I was going off the screenshot in the home page. It's just how I remember it.