|
|
|
|
|
|
by throwaway14050
987 days ago
|
|
|
> Even though it is possible to generate such images without training on real-life examples, do you deny if an AI were trained on those examples it would be better at this task? Nobody is denying that, but that's not the only way to make it better at this task. > seems like by allowing this you could be unintentionally creating a way to launder real-life CSAM through generative AI. There's no way to launder real-life CSAM. If there's a victim, it's a crime, regardless of whether the victim's images went through a ML model or not. |
|
|
The point is with an AI-generated image you don't necessarily know whether there's a victim or not. You can take an image that wouldn't exist without training data sourced from countless victims, and credibly claim everything is perfectly legal and that there wasn't any victim. That's the danger I'm referring to.